“Rethinking Productivity: Why Returning to the Office Isn’t the Only Answer”

AI generated blog image
As the world grapples with the ongoing effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the issue of returning to the office has become a hot topic of debate. In Canada, many businesses are considering bringing their employees back to the office in an attempt to boost productivity and foster collaboration. However, returning to the office may not be the answer to Canada’s productivity problem, and could actually add pressure to urban housing. The idea that being physically present in the office is necessary for productivity is a common belief held by many employers. However, recent studies have shown that remote work can actually increase productivity for many employees. A study conducted by Stanford University found that remote workers were 13% more productive than their in-office counterparts. This is likely due to the fact that remote workers have more control over their work environment, leading to increased focus and efficiency. Returning to the office may also add pressure to urban housing, particularly in major cities like Toronto and Vancouver. Many employees who have been working remotely during the pandemic have taken the opportunity to move to smaller, more affordable cities or even rural areas. If these employees are forced to return to the office, they may be faced with the difficult decision of either commuting long distances or relocating back to urban centers. This could lead to increased competition for housing in already tight markets, driving up prices and making it even more difficult for low- and middle-income families to find affordable housing. In addition to the impact on housing, returning to the office may also have negative effects on employees’ mental health and work-life balance. Many employees have enjoyed the flexibility and autonomy that comes with remote work, allowing them to better balance their work and personal lives. Returning to the office full-time may disrupt this balance, leading to increased stress and burnout among employees. So, what is the solution to Canada’s productivity problem? Rather than forcing employees to return to the office, employers should consider a more flexible approach to work. This could involve a hybrid model, where employees have the option to work remotely part of the time and in the office part of the time. This would allow employees to enjoy the benefits of both remote work and in-person collaboration, without the drawbacks of either. Employers should also focus on improving communication and collaboration among remote teams. This could involve investing in technology that allows for seamless communication and collaboration, as well as providing training and support for remote workers. By fostering a strong sense of teamwork and connection among remote employees, employers can ensure that productivity remains high, regardless of where employees are working. In conclusion, returning to the office may not be the answer to Canada’s productivity problem. Instead, employers should consider a more flexible approach to work that allows employees to work remotely part of the time. This could not only increase productivity, but also alleviate pressure on urban housing and improve employees’ mental health and work-life balance. By embracing remote work and finding innovative ways to foster collaboration among remote teams, employers can create a more productive and sustainable work environment for all employees.

Recommended Reading

If you found this article helpful, you’ll love Teach Your Granny: Project Management.

Teach Your Granny: Project Management breaks down the essentials of project management into easy-to-understand language, supported by clear visuals and practical examples. This book is designed to help readers of all ages and backgrounds grasp the fundamental principles of project management quickly and effectively.


Scroll to Top